After my tirade yesterday, finally
some common sense comes from the judicial branch.
Obama has finally been put in his place regarding transgender bathroom
rights, especially as it pertains to school aged kids.
In a
decision signed on Sunday, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor ruled that the
federal education law known as Title IX "is not ambiguous" about sex
being defined as "the biological and anatomical differences between male
and female students as determined at their birth"1.
The fight
began when a group of 13 states, led by Texas, sought to block what the Obama
administration’s guidance concerning transgender students in public schools
that allowed them to use whichever restroom they choose. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice pursued
a dismissal of the injunction arguing that the guidance is not binding and
comes with no legal ramifications.
However, the U.S. Department of Education has threatened to withhold
federal funding from districts that refuse to accept the Obama Administration’s
guidance on the matter.
In reading through
Title IX, there is nothing to indicate that the writers of the law had anything
other than biological sex in mind. That
is where federal protection begins and ends.
Civil rights
are designed to protect people from circumstances beyond their control. For instance, one cannot help what race they
were born into, their age, a handicap, etc.
In the same manner, one cannot help which sex God made them. When we are forced to enact legislation
because the decisions of a few made them feel their civil rights are being
violated, anarchy is not far behind. Legislating
identity, feelings, persuasion, etc. is a dangerous road.
Common sense
and a sense of well-being for the entire nation, not just a few, should be the
guideposts for legislation and “guidance” in this country. Our moral compass has become so skewed that
people actually think it is a good idea to let 15 year old boys into the girls
locker room because they “identify” as female.
In what
bizzaro world is that healthy for the females who are subjected to these
laws? How do I tell my 14 year old
daughter not to be embarrassed or feel like her
rights to privacy are being violated when a boy shares the locker next to her?
The rights
of a few should never be allowed to trump the rights of the majority in cases
like this. The boys need to keep their parts
in the boy’s room and the girls, vice-versa.
Why is this even a debate?
Please share
if you agree
Sources:
1) Associated Press
